Wednesday, September 03, 2008

The mark of a true leader?

Note to the humor-impaired. The following is a joke. Really. About the only true thing is the first sentence, and the final quote from the same pastor. But the rest of it is admittedly absurd and meant to be funny. In fact, it reminds me of a joke:

Q. How many patriarchs does it take to replace a light bulb?
A. Only a man-hating, ungodly feminist would think that was funny! Stop your male bashing! It's not funny!! Repent!!!

Recently on the internet, I read the following, written by a pastor: "My own thoughts begin with broad shoulders and superior upper body strength when it comes to God’s gifting for the calling of ruling men."

Realizing that I needed to check this out, I immediately called the pastor who had penned these words. He is a kindly, gentle-spirited man who was more than happy to let me know, as nicely as possible, that it did require broad shoulders and superior upper body strength in order to rule men and that, in fact, this was the obvious sign that God had chosen both men in general and a specific man in particular to lead. This was especially true in the Church. Leaders must be strong, manly men. And, he assured me, he was just that sort of man.

I immediately knew what I had to do. Offspring #3, a strapping young man, is always up for a challenge, especially a physical one. He was more than happy to meet with this pastor. Our appointment was that very afternoon.

It turns out that pastor in question is...well, not exactly slim. If his shoulders are broad, it is only because the rest of him is broad. And wide. And deep. But perhaps, underneath all that, lurked a man of superior upper body strength. We were there to find out.

The first test was push-ups. Pastor Un Trim offered to go first. This proved to be more of a challenge than any of us had foreseen. It was sort of like the equivalent of my attempting to do push-ups with a huge, heavy beach ball attached to my stomach. To be polite, we agreed that perhaps push-ups were not the best test. But my son could not resist having me demonstrate how many I could do.

The pastor was aghast. Trying to maintain his gentle composure, he said kindly, but with gritted teeth, "I'm sure there is a Scripture warning women against doing push-ups that pertain to a man. Besides, as your son said, they really don't prove anything."

So it was on to the bench press. Then the shoulder press. Then arm wrestling. By this time, dear Pastor Un Trim was not only drenched in prespiration and completely exhausted, but he was near tears. Just as my son was suggesting another contest, the pastor weakly sighed, "Uncle."

"Huh?" asked my son.

"You win."

So that's how my thirdborn, at the tender age of 18, became a pastor. It was clear that he possessed the broad shoulders and superior upper body sttrength needed to lead men. All the elders agreed, and they also politely refused to challenge him.

"That must be why," one elder said, "Paul told Timothy not to let others despise his youth. It's hard not to be envious of your strength and youthful vigor."

One of the elders' wives was obviously enjoying all this a bit too much. My son has the bad habit of exercising without his shirt on, and had begun to do so. Everyone watching had put an immediate stop to this, screaming in horror when the pastor began removing his own shirt. Now the elder's wife asked teasingly, "Pastor Un Trim, what was it that you wrote about feminists and chests?"

The dejected pastor quoted himself, "Feminists aren't limited in their rebellion to the commands of Scripture but hate and seek to obliterate even the distinction between man and woman visible on our chests. So sad, really--isn't it?"

"Yes, it is sad," the elder's wife agreed. "And I couldn't help but notice how our new pastor has such a manly chest, but you --- you --- why, you look like a big fat girl! So maybe it's not really the feminists who are trying to obliterate that distinction, huh?"

But all is not lost. Word has it that Pastor Un Trim has been dieting and hitting the gym. In fact, he has challenged my son to a rematch in six months. He figures by then he'll be strong enough to win his pulpit back.

This post, along with my entire blog, is copyrighted. Please read and honor the copyright notice at the bottom of the sidebar. Thank you.

5 comments:

  1. Is this the same Trim Brawly who operates a blog with his brother King David over on the Brawly blog?

    Or is it the Brauny blog?

    I forget which!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I probably should attribute the two quote to Tim Bayly:

    "My own thoughts begin with broad shoulders and superior upper body strength when it comes to God’s gifting for the calling of ruling men."

    "Feminists aren't limited in their rebellion to the commands of Scripture but hate and seek to obliterate even the distinction between man and woman visible on our chests. So sad, really--isn't it?"

    But the rest of the post really isn't about anyone in particular, except for perhaps my strong and fit son.

    I have never met Tim Bayly, so I don't want anyone to think I was describing him. I have no reason to believe that he might be either "a kindly, gentle-spirited man" or "well, not exactly slim. If his shoulders are broad, it is only because the rest of him is broad. And wide. And deep." Nor do I have any reason to disparage his upper body strength. Honestly, I have no idea. For all I know, he might be the next Mr. Universe. This post was really about a fictitious pastor. It's a joke. Just to be clear!

    It was inspired, obviously, by the silliness of equating superior upper body strength with gifting for leadership. I'd like to see the Biblical argument for that one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While we're attempting to be funny, I've got to pass on this latest howler from Mr. Bayly on his blog:

    "You know, more than anyone else academics such as yourself should rejoice that there are a few of us left who love sexual diversity instead of seeking to minimize, surgically alter, minimize, and squelch it."

    Enough laughing. Now for a semi-serious response:

    I'm trying to figure out who these masses are who are trying to minimize, surgically alter, minimize (said twice for emphasis!) and squelch this sexual diversity --- especially the surgically alter part. If anything, people are trying to surgically enhance, emphasize and maximize sexual diversity, not the other way around --- look at all the many breast augmentation surgeries being done today. (To say nothing of the near constant spam I get about how to enhance the size of the male organ.)

    Now I'll readily admit that there are some feminists who are very vocal in their opposition to breast augmentation surgery. But I hardly think they should be accused of attempting to minimize sexual diversity. I think they are opposed to the idea that a woman should feel she needs to augment her body in this way.

    I'm not a feminist, and I'll be honest --- despite some extreme pressure, I have not succumbed to breast augmentation. For some reason, God saw fit not to give me the sort of figure that most men prefer to gaze upon. No hourglass here. But, bigger is not necessarily better, and my function has certainly proven better than my form. When a male doctor once made scoffing remarks about my "inadequate breasts", my midwife stopped him and said, "They were more than adequate --- no, they were superior --- in providing her six babies with everything they needed to thrive."

    But that's not the sort of diversity most men are interested in today. But it is the diversity I have refused to surgically alter.

    On to more humorous note: when an older woman I know was rudely informed by her doctor that she had "immature breasts" (breasts that, by the way, had no trouble feeding her babies) she shot back, "They're a lot older than you are, laddie!" And a great deal more mature, I'd venture to say...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rebecca,

    I love your spoofs!

    You know, the more I look around at men's and women's chests, the more I see that the men are the ones who are more like the women than the other way around. Some of them have bigger breasts than I do and that is saying something.

    Also, you are exactly right that people are trying to MAXIMIZE not minimize their gender specific attributes. I think I am about the only one at our neighborhood pool that hasn't been enhanced in the breast dept. It is so prevalent now, not just for the celebs.

    Good thing that God didn't choose His leaders based on the size of their biceps.

    And, if upper body strength is the major prerequisite for leadership, I am quite sure there are many women who could out pushup their pastors.

    ReplyDelete